Both look futuristic. Both promise results. But the Shark vs CurrentBody LED mask question isn’t as straightforward as it seems.
One has cryo pads that feel great but block light. The other? Clinical, but bulky and not exactly gentle on the eyes.
We tried them both – here’s what matters, what feels overhyped, and what you should know before spending a cent.
Shark vs CurrentBody: Quick Comparison
| Feature | Shark CryoGlow | CurrentBody Series 2 |
|---|---|---|
Wavelength Precision | Uses red, blue, and infrared – but doesn’t specify exact nanometers | Clinically validated: 633nm, 830nm, 1072nm (deep near-infrared) |
Anti-Aging Performance | Targets early signs of aging like fine lines with red + infrared light | Designed specifically for wrinkle reduction and collagen synthesis |
Acne Treatment | Strong focus on acne – red + blue light kills bacteria and reduces inflammation | Primarily anti-aging focused, though red light may help with general skin clarity |
Treatment Time | 4–8 minutes depending on mode | 10 minutes |
Best For | Puffiness, acne, short sessions, spa-like feel | Long-term wrinkle reduction, firmness, even tone |
Downsides | Short battery life, cryo pads block under-eye LEDs, fan noise | Bulky to store, expensive, may cause eye strain in sensitive users |
Shark CryoGlow LED Face Mask Review
Shark did a solid job bringing something different to the LED face mask market. The CryoGlow is wireless, sleek, and comes with a cooling feature that – no exaggeration – makes your under-eyes feel like they just had an ice bath. In the best way.
The standout here is definitely the InstaChill™ eye pads. They’re metal, temperature-controlled, and come with three levels of cooling. If you’re prone to puffiness or tired eyes, it’s a major plus.
Add that to the red, blue, and infrared LED combo, and you’ve got a decent all-in-one setup for both acne and early signs of aging.
Core Features
- Red, Blue & Infrared Light Therapy: Targets acne, inflammation, and signs of aging.
- iQLED™ Technology: Shark’s take on LED placement – designed to avoid gaps or hotspots.
- InstaChill™ Under-Eye Cooling: This feature genuinely sets it apart. The cryo element feels nice and visibly reduces puffiness and soothes tired skin in a few minutes.
- Quick Treatments: You’re in and out in 4–8 minutes. That’s a win for busy people who don’t want to commit to long sessions.
What We Liked
- Feels like a mini MedSpa treatment. The cooling feature is surprisingly therapeutic.
- Design is modern and easy to wear. Lightweight, comfortable fit, and wireless.
- FDA-cleared and clinically tested. A big plus for credibility.
What’s Not So Great
- Battery life could be better. Expect to recharge after 3–4 uses.
- The fan can be noisy during cooling mode. Not loud enough to ruin the experience, but noticeable.
- Cryo pads partially block under-eye light exposure. You get the cooling, but lose out on light coverage in that zone.
- Not the cheapest option. At $399.99, it’s on the higher end.
Shark CryoGlow™ Pricing
$399.99
Getting Started
Setup is simple. It charges on a stand, powers on with a single button, and connects magnetically to the cryo pads.
Choose your mode (Skin Clearing or Better Aging), pop it on, and relax for 4–8 minutes. It’s pretty much plug-and-glow.
CurrentBody LED Red Light Therapy Mask Review
If you’ve been down the rabbit hole of best LED mask lists, you’ve definitely come across CurrentBody’s Series 2.
It mostly lives up to the hype, but it’s not without its quirks.
What stands out is the clinical quality. You can tell the Series 2 was built with medical-grade precision in mind – three targeted wavelengths (633nm, 830nm, 1072nm), thoughtful LED spacing, and silicone that hugs your face surprisingly well (though not perfectly for all users).
The glow-up is real if you use it consistently, but you’ll need some patience as most visible improvements show up around week 4 to 8.
Core Features
- Three Targeted Wavelengths: Red (633nm), Near-Infrared (830nm), and Deep Near-Infrared (1072nm). Together, these help boost collagen, reduce fine lines, and improve elasticity.
- Flexible Silicone & Chin Strap: Better coverage than Series 1, plus a more secure fit for daily use.
- 10-Minute Treatment Time: Auto shut-off keeps things simple.
- Optional Eye Shields: Useful if you’re light-sensitive or want to multitask (though even with the shields, a few users still experienced eye strain).
- Veritace® Quality Guarantee: Each device comes with an NFC tag so you can verify the clinical-grade calibration and testing process.
What We Liked
- Good build quality. The silicone mold feels durable and comfortable, and the upgraded design has better face coverage than many other masks we’ve tried.
- Science-backed and endorsed by professionals. Real dermatologists vouch for the precision of CurrentBody’s light calibration.
- A-list status. It’s been used on celebs like Lily Collins, Kim Kardashian, and Cillian Murphy’s red carpet team.
What’s Not So Great
- Fit still isn’t perfect. Many have issues with gaps around the nose and chin, even with the new strap system. You may have to adjust it more than you’d like.
- Eye strain is real for some users. Even with the shields, we saw multiple reviews mentioning headaches or sensitivity, especially among people new to LED therapy.
- It’s bulky. Not ideal for travel or easy storage. It doesn’t fold flat, and the controller adds some heft.
- Price tag is steep. At $510, it’s definitely a premium purchase – especially considering some users had issues with customer service or early device failures.
CurrentBody Series 2 Pricing
$510 USD
- Money-back guarantee: 60 days (minus a restocking fee)
- Warranty: Two years
Getting Started
The setup is fairly straightforward. Charge it, strap it on, and press start. The built-in controller lets you toggle the power, and the whole treatment wraps in just 10 minutes.
That said, don’t expect miracles overnight. As with all LED devices, it rewards consistency, and the first few sessions may take a bit of adjustment if you’re light-sensitive or picky about fit.
Feature-by-Feature Comparison
| Feature | Shark CryoGlow™ | CurrentBody Series 2 |
|---|---|---|
Wavelength Precision | Uses red, blue, and infrared – but doesn’t specify exact nanometers | Clinically validated: 633nm, 830nm, 1072nm (deep near-infrared) |
Anti-Aging Performance | Targets early signs of aging like fine lines with red + infrared light | Designed specifically for wrinkle reduction and collagen synthesis |
Acne Treatment | Strong focus on acne – red + blue light kills bacteria and reduces inflammation | Primarily anti-aging focused, though red light may help with general skin clarity |
Under-Eye Support | Cooling cryo pads noticeably reduce puffiness, but partially block LED light exposure under the eyes | No cryo feature, but full LED coverage includes eye area (with optional blackout shields) |
Fit & Comfort | Lightweight and comfortable; wireless with no cords | Snug silicone fit with chin strap for better LED coverage, though slightly bulkier to wear |
Ease of Use | Extremely simple, one-button operation. Great for first-time users | Also easy to use, but slightly more setup with controller and strap adjustment |
Treatment Time | Shorter sessions – 4 to 8 minutes depending on selected mode | Standard 10-minute treatment, backed by clinical studies |
Portability & Storage | Compact and wireless. Easy to pack or travel with | Not travel-friendly; larger frame and non-folding design |
Durability & Support | Solid build, but limited feedback on long-term durability | Comes with Veritace® tag for clinical quality testing; 2-year warranty |
Known Drawbacks | Cryo pads block light under eyes, fan noise during cooling, short battery life | Fit may be imperfect for some face shapes, eye sensitivity reported by a small number of users |
Shark vs CurrentBody: Which Should You Choose?
Both Shark and CurrentBody offer quality LED masks, but they serve slightly different needs.
If you’re looking for a quick, spa-like experience that tackles acne and puffiness with minimal effort, the Shark CryoGlow could be a solid choice. It’s comfortable, fast, and the cryo cooling pads are genuinely soothing. You’ll get visible results with consistent use, especially for redness and early breakouts.
But if you’re in it for the long game – tackling fine lines, boosting collagen, and improving firmness – the CurrentBody Series 2 is the more clinically focused option. The triple-wavelength setup and precise light calibration make it a strong contender for long-term skin health, especially if you’re targeting deeper signs of aging.
That said, both come with trade-offs: Shark sacrifices full under-eye coverage and has a shorter battery life, while CurrentBody can be bulky and not ideal for sensitive eyes. Neither is perfect.
Here’s Our Take:
- Choose Shark if you want: fast, wireless treatments for acne, puffiness, or light skincare support – and love the idea of cryo cooling.
- Choose CurrentBody if you want: clinically-backed anti-aging performance, deeper LED penetration, and don’t mind investing more for a long-term skincare device.
Don’t Pay More For Frustrating Trade-Offs
Get full-face LED results – no gaps, no strain.
SHOP NOW – GET $100 OFF
Frequently Asked Questions
Do LED face masks really work for anti-aging?
Yes, when used consistently. Clinical studies show that red and near-infrared light can boost collagen production, reduce fine lines, and improve skin elasticity over time – usually within 4 to 8 weeks.
Can I use an LED face mask if I have sensitive skin?
Most LED masks are safe for sensitive skin, but it’s important to start slow. If you’re prone to redness or irritation, choose a device with gentle wavelengths and no heat or cryo stimulation that could trigger flare-ups.
Is more expensive always better when it comes to LED masks?
Not necessarily. A higher price doesn’t always mean better results – it often reflects branding or add-ons. What matters most is LED precision, wavelength depth, coverage, and clinical backing.
What’s the difference between red, blue, and infrared light in these masks?
Red light targets aging by stimulating collagen; blue light fights acne-causing bacteria; and infrared penetrates deeper layers to improve circulation and firmness. The best masks offer all three for well-rounded results.
Conclusion
When it comes to the Shark vs CurrentBody LED mask debate, both offer real benefits, but neither is without compromises.
Shark stands out for its cryo cooling and quick sessions, though the under-eye coverage takes a hit and the fan noise is a bit distracting. CurrentBody leans clinical, with precise wavelengths and deeper collagen support, but some users report fit issues, light sensitivity, and bulky design that’s not ideal for everyday use.
If you’re looking for a third option that gives you the best of both – full-face coverage, 7 targeted wavelengths, comfort that doesn’t strain your eyes, and no cryo-blocked zones or awkward strap setups – the Lumi Visage mask is worth checking out.
Shop now to get $100 off and see visible skin results without the trade-offs.
